I have a profile over on the Austin door64 site and began cross posting my blog recently. A frequent poster spawned a new thread yesterday after reading an eWeek article on Salesforce.com including a “Twitter in the Cloud” offering.
Here’s a link to the eWeek article:
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Applications/Salesforcecom-Puts-Twitter-in-Its-Service-Cloud-351280/
Clearly, this is another example of a company getting in on what everyone now recognizes as an industry buzz with some momentum. And the offering certainly gets very very close to what I’ve been talking about, though my example was more targeted at a specific workflow challenges.
I had a similar experience not long ago. I had tossed out a Twitter update lamenting the fact that the Flock web browser had no native support for Linked-In despite including just about everything else. Low and behold, Flock responded the next day and indicated that Linked-In had yet to open up their API, which was a gating factor in Flock including it in their offering. It was a great example of how companies are out there mining for dissatisfied customers and getting ahead of them with no direct inbound request from the user themselves.
But I’m a hands-on-the-keyboard implementation guy and once you get past the edgy buzz and fuzzy value, I still think the far more boring and practical implications have miles to go. Off the top of my head are questions like:
- What happens after someone discovers a product mention out in the Social Media Cloud?
- Is a case created automatically?
- What kind of workflow happens as a result?
- What determines which team in the organization handles the mention?
- How new or old is the data and what aspect of the system is able to discern from a Twitter update last week that was already handled vs. one today. (Closing the loop is always the hard part)
- What kind of performance management reporting is being generated that offers any kind of meaningful, actionable information? If you aren’t learning, then what are you doing, exactly?
The one I find the most intriguing is that any time you have a “case” or “incident” there’s typically a need to bind it to a customer entity. I wonder how companies will bind the case when they don’t know who the entity is beyond “twitter.com/their_profile”? It has interesting implications for the CRM players, who’s entire notion of customer management is built around the idea that you KNOW who your customer is. Certainly during my time at Motion, where the entire Sales channel was built off a network of distributors and resellers, the biggest challenge was knowing who owned the product and where? The distributor model made your view of the customer very opaque.
It quickly becomes a “Customer Master Creation” problem. And now a Company profile as well as individual Contact profiles will need to provide facilities for capturing the Facebook site location, Twitter, etc. You might as well have their status updates fed directly in to the CRM system and trigger workflow off of those. Interesting.
Most importantly, how on earth does a company justify the soft costs and hard costs that go with this? What P&L eats the line item? Does inside Sales own it? Customer Service? Marketing? Is it shared? The reality is that it will end up in the Service organization at some point as being yet another channel that has to be monitored and maintained, and heaven forbid a Twitter inferno starts over something innocuous. The last thing in the world you need is a VP of Sales, or the CEO, screaming bloody murder because Service wasn’t able to contain a Twitter update gone awry and now it’s perpetuating like mad.
Unless you have mechanisms that leave you in defensible positions you’ll find a lot of resistance to incorporating this stuff in to the Service teams. If I were running your service or support organization I’d want to define very clearly and very early on what metrics determined success or failure before I took on the headcount and ownership.
Perhaps SFDC has addressed many of these questions already. I’ll have to go read up on what the Salesforce.com offering is in more detail. I have some friends who work there and I’m curious to see what they perceive the value is along with the elegance of the implementation. I’ll circle back and share what I learn, if anything.
Jay